Beldon v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Beldon v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

174 S.W.3d 9, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 13, 2005

DocketED 85147

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 S.W.3d 9 (Beldon v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beldon v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, 174 S.W.3d 9, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Norfolk Southern Railway Company (“Employer”), appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, awarding Respondent, Rick Beldon (“Claimant”), $1,100,000 in damages for personal injury. Employer claims that the trial court erred in refusing to grant its motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Norfolk Southern Railway Company (“Employer”), appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, awarding Respondent, Rick Beldon (“Claimant”), $1,100,000 in damages for personal injury. Employer claims that the trial court erred in refusing to grant its motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 S.W.3d 9, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beldon-v-norfolk-southern-railway-company-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack