Belding v. Texas Produce Co.

33 S.W. 421, 61 Ark. 377, 1895 Ark. LEXIS 116
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided December 14, 1895·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Battle, J.

When the Texas Produce Company held the demised premises after the expiration of the term of two years, and thereafter paid, and Belding received, rent for the same according to the terms of the first tenancy, without any new or different agreement, it thereby became a tenant from year to year upon the terms of the original lease. Belding had the right to terminate the tenancy by selling the premises. When he did so, and at the same time sold his adjoining property, he became liable to the Texas Produce Company for two-thirds of the appraised value of the stable erected on the demised premises, according to the terms of the original lease. Schuyler v. Smith, 51 N. Y. 309, and cases cited.

There is no material or prejudicial error in the instructions of the trial court to the jury, and its judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belding v. Texas Produce Co., 33 S.W. 421, 61 Ark. 377, 1895 Ark. LEXIS 116 (Ark. 1895).

33 S.W. 421 (Belding v. Texas Produce Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seidenstricker Farms v. DOSS FAMILY TRUST
270 S.W.3d 842 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2008)
Gostin v. Needle
45 A.2d 772 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1946)
Chappell v. Reynolds
176 S.W.2d 154 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1943)
Riverside Land Co. v. Big Rock Stone & Material Co.
40 S.W.2d 423 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1931)
Jonesboro Trust Co. v. Harbough
244 S.W. 455 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1922)
Lamew v. Townsend
227 S.W. 593 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1921)
Clifford v. Smith Meat Co.
163 P. 808 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1917)