Belding v. Burlingham
This text of 1 Hill & Den. 361 (Belding v. Burlingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although this question seems never to have been decided in this court, it is settled in the court of chancery that the party is only entitled to the expense of printing, for the necessary copies of the points furnished . to the court and counsel on the argument. There [362]*362is no difference in principle between cases upon appeal and those on writs of error, so far as relates to this question, and the practice of the taxing officers should be the same in both courts. We have considered the matter, and- are of opinion that the chancellor has laid down the true rule. There must, therefore, be a re-taxation.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Hill & Den. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belding-v-burlingham-nysupct-1841.