Belcher v. Vulcan Materials Co.

359 So. 2d 386, 1978 Ala. LEXIS 1961
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 26, 1978·No. 77-414·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

MADDOX, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

By denying the writ, we point out that writs of certiorari are frequently denied without any consideration of the merits. Haden v. Olan Mills, Inc., 273 Ala. 129, 135 So.2d 388 (1961). A denial of certiorari should never be considered as an expression by the reviewing court on the merits of the controversy. See Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers, 240 U.S. 251, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L.Ed. 629 (1916). Our denial of the writ should not be understood as approving or disapproving the language used, or the statements of law contained in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. See Cooper v. State, 287 Ala. 728, 252 So.2d 108 (1971).

TORBERT, C. J., and JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belcher v. Vulcan Materials Co., 359 So. 2d 386, 1978 Ala. LEXIS 1961 (Ala. 1978).

359 So. 2d 386 (Belcher v. Vulcan Materials Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banks v. Premier Service Co.
184 So. 3d 370 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2014)
Jimmy Stein Motor Lines, Inc. v. Griffin
643 So. 2d 1388 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1994)
Marshall v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
402 A.2d 575 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1979)