Belcher v. Massey Bros.

68 S.E. 460, 8 Ga. App. 34, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 14
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 5, 1910·No. 2503·Published

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

In this case there was no appearance for the plaintiff in error, and this court, complying with the request of counsel for the defendant in error, opened the record, and, after considering the charaeter of the errors assigned, is satisfied that the writ of error was sued out for delay only. The judgment is therefore affirmed, with ten per cent, damages oh the amount of the judgment in the court below. Civil Code, § 5594; Craton v. Hackney, 91 Ga. 192 (17 S. E. 124).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belcher v. Massey Bros., 68 S.E. 460, 8 Ga. App. 34, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 14 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

68 S.E. 460 (Belcher v. Massey Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Craton v. Hackney
17 S.E. 124 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1893)