Belcher v. Kleeb

109 P. 798, 59 Wash. 166, 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1157
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJune 24, 1910
DocketNo. 8766
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 109 P. 798 (Belcher v. Kleeb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Belcher v. Kleeb, 109 P. 798, 59 Wash. 166, 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1157 (Wash. 1910).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to restrain the defendants from cutting and removing timber from certain real estate, and to quiet title. Judgment was entered as prayed for in the complaint. The defendants have appealed.

It appears that, on August 18, 1906, the appellant Jqhn W. Kleeb purchased “all the merchantable timber standing, being, and lying” upon the lands in controversy. The timber was conveyed by deed, which recited that it was “to be cut and removed within two years from the date hereof.” The timber was not cut within the two years, and no effort was made to remove any of it until June 1, 1909. This action was thereupon brought to restrain the removal of the timber. All the questions raised in this case were presented and decided by this court in Lehtonen v. Marysville Water & Power Co., 50 Wash. 359, 97 Pac. 292, and in Allen & Nelson Mill Co. v. Vaughn, 57 Wash. 163, 106 Pac. 622. We are satisfied with the rule stated in those cases. This case cannot be distinguished from those.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leuthold v. Davis
355 P.2d 6 (Washington Supreme Court, 1960)
Short v. Short
40 P.2d 752 (Washington Supreme Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 P. 798, 59 Wash. 166, 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belcher-v-kleeb-wash-1910.