Belcher v. Graham

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Belcher v. Graham

678 So. 2d 834, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6782

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 1996·No. Nos. 95-0675, 95-1824·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm all issues on appeal. On the cross-appeal, we reverse the amended judgment of costs in favor of defendant and remand for reinstatement of the original judgment of attorney’s fees and costs in defendant’s favor. See Metropolitan Dade County v. Jones Boatyard, Inc., 611 So.2d 512 (Fla.1993); Aspen v. Bayless, 564 So.2d 1081 (Fla.1990).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., and MELVIN B. GROSSMAN, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm all issues on appeal. On the cross-appeal, we reverse the amended judgment of costs in favor of defendant and remand for reinstatement of the original judgment of attorney’s fees and costs in defendant’s favor. See Metropolitan Dade County v. Jones Boatyard, Inc., 611 So.2d 512 (Fla.1993); Aspen v. Bayless, 564 So.2d 1081 (Fla.1990).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., and MELVIN B. GROSSMAN, Associate Judge, concur.

Belcher v. Graham, 678 So. 2d 834, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6782 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

678 So. 2d 834 (Belcher v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related