Belcher v. Denton
This text of 2015 Ark. App. 492 (Belcher v. Denton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 492
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CV-14-1090
Opinion Delivered September 16, 2015
JOAN TILLMAN BELCHER, SPECIAL APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI ADMINISTRATRIX of THE ESTATE of COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, CORNELIUS TILLMAN, DECEASED THIRD DIVISION APPELLANT [NO. 60CV-12-3452]
V. HONORABLE CHRIS PALMER, JUDGE JERRY DENTON APPELLEE DISMISSED
WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge
Joan Tillman Belcher, Special Adminstratrix of the Estate of Cornelius Tillman,
appeals the June 19, 2014 judgment of the Pulaski County Circuit Court finding that Tillman
was forty-nine point nine percent (49.9%) at fault in causing his own death and reducing the
$7,612 judgment by that percentage. On appeal, appellant argues that: (1) there was no
evidence that Tillman was negligent, and, therefore, the issue of his negligence should not
have been submitted to the jury; (2) the jury instructions and verdict form given to the jury
were improper; and (3) the damages awarded by the jury were insufficient and failed to take
into account all elements of the injury proven. We dismiss for lack of a final order.1
1 This is the second time this appeal has been before us. In Belcher v. Denton, 2015 Ark. App. 270, we ordered rebriefing because appellant’s abstract, brief, and addendum did not comply with our rules. Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 492
This case arose from a fatal pedestrian collision. Jerry Denton was driving through
Wrightsville, Arkansas,2 at approximately 5:00 a.m. on June 2, 2011, when he fatally struck
Tillman. Belcher, as special administratrix of Tillman’s estate, brought a negligence action
against Denton seeking damages for wrongful death on behalf of the estate and statutory
beneficiaries, as well as punitive damages. The jury trial took place on June 10 and June 11,
2014. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of appellant in the
amount of $7,612; however, that amount was to be reduced by 49.9%. The court issued a
judgment on the jury verdict on June 19, 2014. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal on
June 20, 2014. Appellant filed a motion for new trial on July 2, 2014; however, the court
never ruled on that motion. There was no amended notice of appeal filed.
No party has raised the issue, but whether an order is final for appeal purposes is a
jurisdictional point that we must often raise on our own. Rule 2(a)(1) of the Arkansas Rules
of Appellate Procedure–Civil3 states that an appeal may be taken from a final judgment or
decree, absent some exceptions that do not apply. A final order is one that dismisses the
parties, discharges them from the action, or concludes their rights to the subject matter in
controversy.4 As a general rule, a judgment or order is not final and appealable if the issue of
damages remains to be decided.5 Absent a final order or a properly executed certificate from
the circuit court making an express determination, supported by specific factual findings, that
2 The accident took place on Arkansas State Highway 365. 3 (2015). 4 Prochazka v. Bee-Three Development, LLC, 2014 Ark. App. 318. 5 Foster v. Crawford, 2014 Ark. App. 251. 2 Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 492
there is no just reason for delay, an order that fails to adjudicate all of the parties’ claims
cannot be appealed.6
Here, the judgment appealed from does not dispose of appellant’s punitive-damages
claim, and there is some question as to if it completely disposes of all of the estate’s and
beneficiaries’ claims. We note that there has been no Rule 54(b) certificate issued. Without
a final order or a sufficient Rule 54(b) certificate, we do not have jurisdiction to hear this case
and must dismiss this appeal without prejudice.
Dismissed.
ABRAMSON and HARRISON, JJ., agree.
The Law Offices of Peter Miller, P.A., by: Jessican Virden, for appelant.
W. Lee Tucker, PLLC, by: W. Lee Tucker, for appellee.
6 Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b) (2015). 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 Ark. App. 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belcher-v-denton-arkctapp-2015.