Belcher v. Burnett

126 Mass. 230, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 214
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 21, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 126 Mass. 230 (Belcher v. Burnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Belcher v. Burnett, 126 Mass. 230, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 214 (Mass. 1879).

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The interest of the petitioner in the estate of her grandmother, though a contingent remainder which would not vest in possession unless and until she survived her parents, was yet vested in her in right from the death of the testatrix, capable of alienation by her during the life of her parents, and, as has been directly adjudged by this court, was such an interest as would pass to an assignee under the insolvent law of the Commonwealth, or under the United States bankrupt act of 1841. subject to the same contingencies in the hands of the assignee as in those of the assignor. Dunn v. Sargent, 101 Mass. 336. Merriam v. Simonds, 121 Mass. 198, 202. Gardner v. Hooper, 3 Gray, 398. Nash v. Nash, 12 Allen, 345. Minot v. Tappan, 122 Mass. 535. Daniels v. Eldredge, 125 Mass. 356.

The terms of the bankrupt act of 1867, though differing in language, are equally comprehensive in effect. U. S. St. March 2, 1867, § 14. U. S. Rev. Sts, §§ 5044, 5046. Leonard v. Nye, 125 Mass. 455. Erwin v. United States, 97 U. S. 392. Durant v. Massachusetts Hospital Life Ins. Co. 2 Lowell, 575, 579. The decision of Mr. Justice Washington in the early case of Krumbaar v. Burt, 2 Wash. C. C. 406, upon which the petitioner relies, proceeded upon the same narrow construction of the bankrupt act of 1801, which that learned judge afterwards applied in Vasse v. Comegys, 4 Wash. C. C. 570, in which he was overruled by the Supreme Court of the United States. Comegys v. Vasse, 1 Pet. 193, 218.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Billings v. Fowler
279 N.E.2d 906 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1972)
Shindler v. Robinson
150 A.D. 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Southard v. Southard
96 N.E. 941 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Clarke v. Fay
91 N.E. 328 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Gilkie v. Marsh
71 N.E. 703 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)
Bertelman v. Kahilina
14 Haw. 378 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1902)
Bunting v. Speek
41 Kan. 424 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1889)
Putnam v. Story
132 Mass. 205 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1882)
In re McKenna
9 F. 27 (W.D. Tennessee, 1881)
Brigham v. Home Life Insurance
131 Mass. 319 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1881)
Tirrell v. Bacon
3 F. 62 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 Mass. 230, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belcher-v-burnett-mass-1879.