Belcher v. Belcher

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Belcher v. Belcher

691 So. 2d 1126, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3193, 1997 WL 134320

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 26, 1997·No. No. 95-3180·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the former husband’s motion for modification of child support. The court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, Ballantyne v. Ballantyne, 666 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), where, as here, the former husband has not met the burden of demonstrating a change in circumstances. Hand v. Kushmer, 673 So.2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). We also affirm, as modified, the assessment of child-support arrearages against the former husband. We reduce the arrearages amount charged in paragraph four to $10,426.07. The trial court improperly ordered the former husband to pay $1,260.00 for psychiatrist/psychologist fees in contravention of the settlement agreement.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the former husband’s motion for modification of child support. The court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, Ballantyne v. Ballantyne, 666 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), where, as here, the former husband has not met the burden of demonstrating a change in circumstances. Hand v. Kushmer, 673 So.2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). We also affirm, as modified, the assessment of child-support arrearages against the former husband. We reduce the arrearages amount charged in paragraph four to $10,426.07. The trial court improperly ordered the former husband to pay $1,260.00 for psychiatrist/psychologist fees in contravention of the settlement agreement.

Affirmed as modified.

Belcher v. Belcher, 691 So. 2d 1126, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3193, 1997 WL 134320 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

691 So. 2d 1126 (Belcher v. Belcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related