Belcher v. Belcher

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Belcher v. Belcher

691 So. 2d 1126, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3193, 1997 WL 134320

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 1997

DocketNo. 95-3180

StatusPublished

This text of 691 So. 2d 1126 (Belcher v. Belcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Belcher v. Belcher, 691 So. 2d 1126, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3193, 1997 WL 134320 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the former husband’s motion for modification of child support. The court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, Ballantyne v. Ballantyne, 666 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), where, as here, the former husband has not met the burden of demonstrating a change in circumstances. Hand v. Kushmer, 673 So.2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). We also affirm, as modified, the assessment of child-support arrearages against the former husband. We reduce the arrearages amount charged in paragraph four to $10,426.07. The trial court improperly ordered the former husband to pay $1,260.00 for psychiatrist/psychologist fees in contravention of the settlement agreement.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the former husband’s motion for modification of child support. The court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, Ballantyne v. Ballantyne, 666 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), where, as here, the former husband has not met the burden of demonstrating a change in circumstances. Hand v. Kushmer, 673 So.2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). We also affirm, as modified, the assessment of child-support arrearages against the former husband. We reduce the arrearages amount charged in paragraph four to $10,426.07. The trial court improperly ordered the former husband to pay $1,260.00 for psychiatrist/psychologist fees in contravention of the settlement agreement.

Affirmed as modified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

691 So. 2d 1126, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3193, 1997 WL 134320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belcher-v-belcher-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack