Belasco v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Big Spring

Fifth Circuit

Belasco v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Big Spring

156 F. App'x 671

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 6, 2005

Docket04-11351

StatusUnpublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 156 F. App'x 671 (Belasco v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Big Spring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Belasco v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Big Spring, 156 F. App'x 671 (5th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Rene R. Belasco, federal prisoner # 15787-083, appeals from the district court’s denial and dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the method used by the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) for calculating good-time credits. Belasco sought an accelerated release based on his own method of calculation. During the pendency of this appeal, Belasco completed his imprisonment term, and he has been released from the BOP’s custody. The issues Belasco has raised on appeal have thus been rendered moot by his release. See Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir.1987).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Rene R. Belasco, federal prisoner # 15787-083, appeals from the district court’s denial and dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the method used by the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) for calculating good-time credits. Belasco sought an accelerated release based on his own method of calculation. During the pendency of this appeal, Belasco completed his imprisonment term, and he has been released from the BOP’s custody. The issues Belasco has raised on appeal have thus been rendered moot by his release. See Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir.1987).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 F. App'x 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belasco-v-warden-federal-correctional-institution-big-spring-ca5-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack