Bel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Bel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

845 So. 2d 1058

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 30, 2003

Docket2003-C-0734

StatusPublished

This text of 845 So. 2d 1058 (Bel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 845 So. 2d 1058 (La. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

845 So.2d 1058 (2003)

Mary BEL, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Her Husband, Douglas Bel; and Linda B. Mire and Carolyn B. Heard
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Allstate Insurance Company, Regal Insurance Company, Craig Lewis, Individually and d/b/a Craig Lewis State Farm Agency.

No. 2003-C-0734.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 30, 2003.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

845 So. 2d 1058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bel-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-company-la-2003.

Opinion

Mary BEL, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Her Husband, Douglas Bel; and Linda B. Mire and Carolyn B. Heard v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Allstate Insurance Company, Regal Insurance Company, Craig Lewis, Individually and d/b/a Craig Lewis State Farm Agency.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Mary BEL, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Her Husband, Douglas Bel; and Linda B. Mire and Carolyn B. Heard
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Allstate Insurance Company, Regal Insurance Company, Craig Lewis, Individually and d/b/a Craig Lewis State Farm Agency.