Bekins v. Smith

174 P. 942, 37 Cal. App. 802, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 341
California Court of Appeal·Decided July 29, 1918·No. Civ. No. 2502.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In this action plaintiff had judgment in the court below and defendant Ella Smith appealed. An undertaking was given to stay execution and a stay followed. Plaintiff moved to strike out the undertaking and vacate the stay. That motion was denied and this appeal was then taken. The appeal in the main case has been determined by this court and the judgment of the lower court reversed. (Bekins v. Smith et al.,ante, p. 222, [174 P. 96].) The judgment made on determining that appeal has become final. It would serve no purpose affecting the rights of the parties litigant to now take up the questions discussed as to the validity of the stay bond given in the case. Such questions have become of mere abstract interest. (Adams v. Prather et al., 176 Cal. 164, (167 P. 867].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bekins v. Smith, 174 P. 942, 37 Cal. App. 802, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 341 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

174 P. 942 (Bekins v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Lodi v. Randtron
13 Cal. Rptr. 3d 107 (California Court of Appeal, 2004)