Beke v. Estate of Molnar

88 So. 2d 147, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 3776
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 18, 1956
StatusPublished

This text of 88 So. 2d 147 (Beke v. Estate of Molnar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beke v. Estate of Molnar, 88 So. 2d 147, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 3776 (Fla. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

TERRELL, Acting C. J., and THOMAS, HOBSON and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 So. 2d 147, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 3776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beke-v-estate-of-molnar-fla-1956.