BE&K Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

534 U.S. 1074, 122 S. Ct. 803, 151 L. Ed. 2d 689, 70 U.S.L.W. 3426, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 154, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 6
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 4, 2002·No. No. 01-518·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Did the Court of Appeals.err in holding that under Bill Johnson’s Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB, 461 U. S. 731 (1983), the NLRB may impose liability on an employer for filing a losing retaliatory lawsuit, even if the employer could show the suit was not objectively baseless under Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., 508 U.S. 49 (1993)?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BE&K Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 534 U.S. 1074, 122 S. Ct. 803, 151 L. Ed. 2d 689, 70 U.S.L.W. 3426, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 154, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 6 (2002).

534 U.S. 1074 (BE&K Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sahli v. Bull HN Information Systems, Inc.
774 N.E.2d 1085 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2002)