Beistle Co. v. Commonwealth

638 A.2d 943, 536 Pa. 160, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 46
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 8, 1994
DocketAppeal No. 98
StatusPublished

This text of 638 A.2d 943 (Beistle Co. v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beistle Co. v. Commonwealth, 638 A.2d 943, 536 Pa. 160, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 46 (Pa. 1994).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

NIX, C.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. LARSEN, J., did not participate in the decision of this case. MONTEMURO, J., who was an appointed Justice of the Court at the time of argument, participated in the decision of this case in his capacity as Senior Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
638 A.2d 943, 536 Pa. 160, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beistle-co-v-commonwealth-pa-1994.