Beissell v. Sholl

4 U.S. 211, 4 Dall. 211
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 1, 1800·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

4 U.S. 211 (____)
4 Dall. 211

Beissell
versus
Sholl.[(1)]
Wagoner
versus
Same.

Supreme Court of United States.

CASE, for diverting a water course. The COURT left the facts to the jury, under this general statement of the law: "That every man, in this country, has an unquestionable right, "to erect a mill upon his own land; and to use the water, passing "through his land, as he pleases: subject only to this limitation, "that his mill must not be so constructed and employed, "as to injure his neighbour's mill; and that, after using the "water, he returns the stream to its ancient channel."

NOTES

[(1)] Tried in the Circuit Court, Northampton county, June 1800, before SHIPPEN, C.J. and YEATES, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beissell v. Sholl, 4 U.S. 211, 4 Dall. 211 (1800).

4 U.S. 211 (Beissell v. Sholl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blanchard v. Baker
8 Me. 253 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1832)
Binney's Case
2 Md. Ch. 99 (Maryland Chancery Ct, 1829)
Philips v. Stocket
1 Tenn. 200 (Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity, 1806)
Merritt v. Parker
1 N.J.L. 526 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1795)