Beisner v. Kelly
This text of 15 A.D.2d 527 (Beisner v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No opinion. Beldock, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and Christ, J., concur in affirmance insofar as it holds: (1) that the State court has jurisdiction to determine the issues raised (cf. Lavery’s Main St. Grill v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees-Bartenders Union Local 288, 146 Conn. 93), and (2) that wrongful or unlawful picketing should be enjoined; but otherwise dissent from the affirmance on the ground that under the circumstances here the injunctive provisions of the judgment are too broad, and vote to modify the judgment so as to permit peaceful picketing for any lawful objective (Teamsters Union v. Vogt, Inc., 354 U. S. 284; Cafeteria Union v. Angelos, 320 U. S. 293; Pennock Co. v. Ferretti, 283 App. Div. 527).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 A.D.2d 527, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beisner-v-kelly-nyappdiv-1961.