Beinin v. Berk
444 N.E.2d 1005, 58 N.Y.2d 660, 458 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3899
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (88 AD2d 884; see November v Time, Inc., 13 NY2d 175).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beinin v. Berk, 444 N.E.2d 1005, 58 N.Y.2d 660, 458 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3899 (N.Y. 1982).
444 N.E.2d 1005 (Beinin v. Berk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Versaci v. Richie
30 A.D.3d 648 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Erlitz v. Erlitz v. Segal, Liling & Erlitz
142 A.D.2d 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Gleich v. Kissinger
111 A.D.2d 130 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)