Bein v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bein v. County of Nassau

17 A.D.3d 303, 791 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3478

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.3d 303 (Bein v. County of Nassau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bein v. County of Nassau, 17 A.D.3d 303, 791 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3478 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for civil rights violations pursuant to 42 USC § 1983, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), dated September 22, 2003, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[304]*304In opposition to the defendants’ prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Cummings v Mclntire, 271 F3d 341 [2001]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Thus, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted. Ritter, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for civil rights violations pursuant to 42 USC § 1983, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), dated September 22, 2003, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[304]*304In opposition to the defendants’ prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Cummings v Mclntire, 271 F3d 341 [2001]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Thus, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted. Ritter, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.3d 303, 791 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bein-v-county-of-nassau-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack