Beilstein's Estate

23 A. 349, 147 Pa. 85, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 788
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 4, 1892·No. Appeal, No. 307·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee. Cubiam,

The court below was entirely right in dismissing the appellant’s petition. Conceding that the minor, Gertie Beilstein, has at least a life-estate in the “ Old Seaton House, situated No. 34 Diamond Square, Pittsburgh,” it by no means follows that she is entitled to the present possession ofeit. The will of George P. Beilstein, under which she claims, creates a trust for her until she becomes of age. In the meantime, she is to be paid twenty-five dollars per month. The corpus of the residuary estate, including the house in question, is to remain in the possession of the trustee until the time for its payment or distribution arrives. It matters not whether we call the executors trustees, or testamentary guardians; the result is the same.

The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant. C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beilstein's Estate, 23 A. 349, 147 Pa. 85, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 788 (Pa. 1892).

23 A. 349 (Beilstein's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust, Etc.
452 A.2d 1360 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Siebert v. Bird
452 A.2d 1360 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Hewson's Estate
17 Pa. D. & C. 725 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1932)