Beil v. TELESIS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
969 A.2d 1177, 600 Pa. 628, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 559
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED as to the following issues:
*629 1. Did the Superior Court misapply Farabaugh v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 590 Pa. 46, 911 A.2d 1264 (2006)?
2. Did the Superior Court improperly fail to view the evidence in the light most favorable to Petitioners, as verdict-winners?
3. Did the Superior Court misapply both Section 414 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) and this Court’s opinion in Byrd v. Merwin, 456 Pa. 516, 317 A.2d 280 (1974)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beil v. TELESIS CONSTRUCTION, INC., 969 A.2d 1177, 600 Pa. 628, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 559 (Pa. 2009).
969 A.2d 1177 (Beil v. TELESIS CONSTRUCTION, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beil v. Telesis Construction, Inc.
11 A.3d 456 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)