Beil v. TELESIS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
969 A.2d 1177, 600 Pa. 628, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 559
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 1, 2009
Docket483 EAL 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 969 A.2d 1177 (Beil v. TELESIS CONSTRUCTION, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Beil v. TELESIS CONSTRUCTION, INC., 969 A.2d 1177, 600 Pa. 628, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 559 (Pa. 2009).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED as to the following issues:
*629 1. Did the Superior Court misapply Farabaugh v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 590 Pa. 46, 911 A.2d 1264 (2006)?
2. Did the Superior Court improperly fail to view the evidence in the light most favorable to Petitioners, as verdict-winners?
3. Did the Superior Court misapply both Section 414 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) and this Court’s opinion in Byrd v. Merwin, 456 Pa. 516, 317 A.2d 280 (1974)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Beil v. Telesis Construction, Inc.
11 A.3d 456 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
969 A.2d 1177, 600 Pa. 628, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beil-v-telesis-construction-inc-pa-2009.