Beikirch v. Loebs

243 A.D. 859
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 243 A.D. 859 (Beikirch v. Loebs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beikirch v. Loebs, 243 A.D. 859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that respondent’s petition reveals present knowledge by him of facts sufficient to formulate the cause of action which he claims. While an examination under rule 122 of the Rules of Civil Practice may be had to facilitate the accurate pleading of a known cause of action, it will not be allowed to enable plaintiff to ascertain whether facts exist sufficient to create a cause of action. All concur. (The order granted an examination of defendants before trial to enable plaintiff to frame a complaint in a libel action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Roland
10 A.D.2d 263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
New Rochelle Precision Grinding Corp. v. Marino
9 A.D.2d 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Halasz v. City of New York
17 Misc. 2d 937 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Pfaudler Permutit Inc. v. Presto Plastic Products Co.
7 A.D.2d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Stewart v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co.
3 A.D.2d 582 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Corbin v. Niagara Junction Railway Co.
1 A.D.2d 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
East v. Endicott Forging & Manufacturing Co.
280 A.D. 651 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Kenerson v. Davis
278 A.D. 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Talley v. Lamb
188 Misc. 389 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
Tremblay v. Lyon
176 Misc. 906 (New York Supreme Court, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beikirch-v-loebs-nyappdiv-1935.