Behrmann v. Brown
113 S.E. 273, 122 S.C. 39, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 220
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
It will not be necessary to consider the exceptions in detail. It was clearly the intention of the mortgagor, not only to secure the payment for the advances made to him by the mortgagee to the aggregate amount of $250 mentioned in the chattel mortgage and the amount of $99 mentioned in the bill of sale, but likewise the payment for any additional advances made by the mortgagee to the mortgagor. Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Behrmann v. Brown, 113 S.E. 273, 122 S.C. 39, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 220 (S.C. 1922).
113 S.E. 273 (Behrmann v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
First Nat'l Bank of Manning v. Pierson
117 S.E. 542 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1923)