Behrman v. Poston

Missouri Court of Appeals

Behrman v. Poston

419 S.W.3d 76, 2013 WL 4807082, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1036

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 10, 2013·No. No. WD 75457·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Behrman appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Donald Lee Poston (“Poston”) and Consumers Insurance Company (“Consumers”). Behrman contends that summary judgment was improper because there was a genuine factual dispute as to whether Poston made fraudulent and/or negligent misrepresentations to Behrman in negotiating an insurance claim. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum fully explaining our decision has been provided to the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Behrman appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Donald Lee Poston (“Poston”) and Consumers Insurance Company (“Consumers”). Behrman contends that summary judgment was improper because there was a genuine factual dispute as to whether Poston made fraudulent and/or negligent misrepresentations to Behrman in negotiating an insurance claim. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum fully explaining our decision has been provided to the parties.

Behrman v. Poston, 419 S.W.3d 76, 2013 WL 4807082, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1036 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

419 S.W.3d 76 (Behrman v. Poston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.