Behrman v. Behrman

376 So. 2d 294
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 31, 1979
Docket79-449
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 376 So. 2d 294 (Behrman v. Behrman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Behrman v. Behrman, 376 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

376 So.2d 294 (1979)

Donald M. BEHRMAN, Appellant,
v.
Martha Mae BEHRMAN, Appellee.

No. 79-449.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 31, 1979.

*295 Stevan T. Northcutt of Levine, Freedman, Hirsch & Levinson, Tampa, for appellant.

Russell K. Peavyhouse of Peavyhouse, Giglio, Grant, Clark, Charlton & Mount, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Donald M. Behrman appeals from the provisions of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, alleging the court erred in making an award of lump sum alimony to appellee and in refusing appellant a special equity in a jointly owned $7,000.00 certificate of deposit.

We affirm all aspects of the final judgment except the denial of a special equity in the certificate of deposit. Appellant testified that the certificate was purchased after his mother's death with funds directly from her estate account. Although some funds from the estate were mingled in the parties' other joint accounts, only estate funds were used to open the account in question. We hold that the ownership rights are easily ascertainable because the funds came from a source unconnected with the marital relationship, and that the subsequent action of the parties in keeping the funds separate from co-mingled funds is consistent with a "no gift" presumption. Lawless v. Lawless, 362 So.2d 302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). See Ball v. Ball, 335 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1976).

REMANDED for entry of an order consistent with this opinion.

HOBSON, Acting C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lakin v. Lakin
901 So. 2d 186 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Spielberger v. Spielberger
712 So. 2d 835 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Amato v. Amato
596 So. 2d 1243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Walser v. Walser
473 So. 2d 306 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Marsh v. Marsh
399 So. 2d 433 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Freeman v. State
376 So. 2d 294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 So. 2d 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/behrman-v-behrman-fladistctapp-1979.