Behrman v. Amer
Opinion
Order
Kevin Behrman appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Marcus Amer and Marcus Amer d/b/a Jack’s Auto Sales (collectively “Amer”), based on the circuit court’s finding that Behrman’s negligence claims were barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations. Behrman contends summary judgment was improper because there was a genuine factual dispute as to whether Amer was equitably estopped from raising the statute of limitations defense based on fraudulent conduct by his insurer. As explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the circuit court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
351 S.W.3d 717 (Behrman v. Amer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.