Behrman v. Amer
This text of 351 S.W.3d 717 (Behrman v. Amer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order
Kevin Behrman appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Marcus Amer and Marcus Amer d/b/a Jack’s Auto Sales (collectively “Amer”), based on the circuit court’s finding that Behrman’s negligence claims were barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations. Behrman contends summary judgment was improper because there was a genuine factual dispute as to whether Amer was equitably estopped from raising the statute of limitations defense based on fraudulent conduct by his insurer. As explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the circuit court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
351 S.W.3d 717, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1029, 2011 WL 3444156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/behrman-v-amer-moctapp-2011.