Behrman v. Amer

351 S.W.3d 717, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1029, 2011 WL 3444156
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 9, 2011·No. WD 72404·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Behrman appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Marcus Amer and Marcus Amer d/b/a Jack’s Auto Sales (collectively “Amer”), based on the circuit court’s finding that Behrman’s negligence claims were barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations. Behrman contends summary judgment was improper because there was a genuine factual dispute as to whether Amer was equitably estopped from raising the statute of limitations defense based on fraudulent conduct by his insurer. As explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the circuit court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Behrman v. Amer, 351 S.W.3d 717, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1029, 2011 WL 3444156 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

351 S.W.3d 717 (Behrman v. Amer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

REPPY v. Winters
351 S.W.3d 717 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)