Behrle v. Hust

199 Ill. App. 437
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMay 12, 1916
DocketGen. No. 21,094
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 Ill. App. 437 (Behrle v. Hust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Behrle v. Hust, 199 Ill. App. 437 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Animals, § 15*—when owner liable for personal injuries inflicted by. An owner having knowledge of the mischievous propensities of an animal, of a kind not naturally vicious, is liable for personal injuries caused by such animal acting in accord with such propensities. 2. Animals, § 15*—what liability of owner of animal known to be of mischievous propensities based upon. Liability of owner of an animal of known mischievous propensities, for injuries caused by it, is not based on negligence but on the fact that he continued to own an animal known by him to be dangerous. 3. Negligence, § 8*—when failure to obey ordinance gives rise to action. Damages resulting from failure to comply with the terms of an ordinance give rise to an action. 4. Animals, § 14*—when owner of illegally unmuzzled dog liable for injuries to person of another. The owner of a dog is liable for damages to one bitten by it rvhere such injury is the proximate result of allowing the dog on the street without being muzzled, in accordance with the provision of an ordinance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wistafka v. Grotowski
205 Ill. App. 529 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 Ill. App. 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/behrle-v-hust-illappct-1916.