Behringer v. 19407 Linden, LLC

139 A.D.3d 777, 29 N.Y.S.3d 816
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 11, 2016
Docket2015-08822
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 139 A.D.3d 777 (Behringer v. 19407 Linden, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Behringer v. 19407 Linden, LLC, 139 A.D.3d 777, 29 N.Y.S.3d 816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Ali Abdullah Sadiq and Ellen Sadiq appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Raffaele, J.), entered June 16, 2015, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a), in effect, to vacate an order of the same court (Rios, J.) entered January 14, 2010, granting the plaintiff’s motion, inter alia, for summary judgment on the complaint and to appoint a referee to compute the amount due to the plaintiff, and pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (3) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants’ contention, “lack of standing is not a defect that deprives a court of subject matter jurisdiction for purposes of CPLR 5015 (a) (4)” (U.S. Bank, N.A. v Peters, 127 AD3d 742, 743 [2015]; see Lacks v Lacks, 41 NY2d 71, 74-75 [1976]; Wells Fargo, N.A. v Levin, 101 AD3d 1519, 1521 [2012]). Accordingly, that branch of the appellants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (4) was properly denied.

The appellants’ request for vacatur under CPLR 5015 (a) (3) was also properly denied (see US Bank N.A. v Smith, 132 AD3d 848, 851 [2015]; New Century Mtge. Corp. v Corriette, 117 AD3d 1011, 1012 [2014]; Bank of N.Y. v Stradford, 55 AD3d 765, 765-766 [2008]).

The appellants’ remaining contentions either are without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination.

Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Roman and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sadiq v. Vitacco
E.D. New York, 2022
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Nath
2018 NY Slip Op 4695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Behringer v. 19407 Linden, LLC
28 N.Y.3d 911 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A.D.3d 777, 29 N.Y.S.3d 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/behringer-v-19407-linden-llc-nyappdiv-2016.