Behrend v. Bell Telephone Company

374 A.2d 536, 473 Pa. 320, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 484
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 3, 1977
Docket1194 Allocatur Docket
StatusPublished
Cited by44 cases

This text of 374 A.2d 536 (Behrend v. Bell Telephone Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Behrend v. Bell Telephone Company, 374 A.2d 536, 473 Pa. 320, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 484 (Pa. 1977).

Opinion

ORDER OF COURT

PER CURIAM.

. And now, this 3rd day of June, 1977, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted, the order of the Superior *321 Court, 242 Pa.Super. 47, 363 A.2d 1152, is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the Superior Court for consideration of the validity, under Article III, Section 18 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, of the limitation of damages provision of respondent’s tariff. See Brief for Appellee in the Superior Court at 16, 30-31. In all other respects the petition for allowance of appeal is denied at this time, but without prejudice to either party to file a further petition for allowance of appeal following further disposition by the Superior Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

C. Johnson & L. Johnson v. PA PUC
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2025
Ciampa, P. v. Conversion Sciences, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PECO
54 A.3d 921 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Tayar v. Camelback Ski Corp.
47 A.3d 1190 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
International Diamond Importers, Ltd. v. Singularity Clark, L.P.
40 A.3d 1261 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Great Northern Insurance v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
517 F. Supp. 2d 723 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2007)
Grant v. Southwestern Electric Power Co.
998 S.W.2d 383 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Danisco Ingredients USA, Inc. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.
986 P.2d 377 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1999)
Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Auchan USA, Inc.
995 S.W.2d 668 (Texas Supreme Court, 1999)
Bash v. Bell Telephone Co.
601 A.2d 825 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Vasilis v. Bell of Pennsylvania
598 A.2d 52 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)
Allen-Myland, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
746 F. Supp. 520 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1990)
Rich Electronics, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
523 So. 2d 670 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Posner v. Lankenau Hospital
645 F. Supp. 1102 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1986)
Municipality of Anchorage v. Locker
723 P.2d 1261 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1986)
Feingold v. Hill
44 Pa. D. & C.3d 610 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1986)
Cloverleaf Development, Inc. v. Horizon Financial F.A.
500 A.2d 163 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
374 A.2d 536, 473 Pa. 320, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/behrend-v-bell-telephone-company-pa-1977.