Behrend v. Bell Telephone Company
This text of 374 A.2d 536 (Behrend v. Bell Telephone Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER OF COURT
. And now, this 3rd day of June, 1977, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted, the order of the Superior *321 Court, 242 Pa.Super. 47, 363 A.2d 1152, is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the Superior Court for consideration of the validity, under Article III, Section 18 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, of the limitation of damages provision of respondent’s tariff. See Brief for Appellee in the Superior Court at 16, 30-31. In all other respects the petition for allowance of appeal is denied at this time, but without prejudice to either party to file a further petition for allowance of appeal following further disposition by the Superior Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
374 A.2d 536, 473 Pa. 320, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/behrend-v-bell-telephone-company-pa-1977.