Behnke v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Behnke v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

263 A.D. 737, 31 N.Y.S.2d 28, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4775

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 737 (Behnke v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Behnke v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 263 A.D. 737, 31 N.Y.S.2d 28, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover for injuries sustained by being thrown from defendant’s trolley car by reason of the closing of the doors as he was entering, the jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $2,500. The court granted defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict on the ground of excessiveness unless plaintiff consented within ten days to reduce the verdict to $1,500. Such consent was filed. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs [738]*738to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover for injuries sustained by being thrown from defendant’s trolley car by reason of the closing of the doors as he was entering, the jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $2,500. The court granted defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict on the ground of excessiveness unless plaintiff consented within ten days to reduce the verdict to $1,500. Such consent was filed. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs [738]*738to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 737, 31 N.Y.S.2d 28, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/behnke-v-brooklyn-queens-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1941.