Behn, Meter & Co. v. Sutherland

280 U.S. 589
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 21, 1929
DocketNo. 360; No. 371
StatusPublished

This text of 280 U.S. 589 (Behn, Meter & Co. v. Sutherland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Behn, Meter & Co. v. Sutherland, 280 U.S. 589 (1929).

Opinion

Petitions [590]*590for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied.

Messrs. Frederic R. Coudert, J. Harry Covington, Mahlon B. Doing, and Spencer Gordon, for Behn, Meyer & Company. Solicitor General Hughes, Assistant Attorney General Farnum, and Mr. Claude R. Branch for Sutherland et al.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 U.S. 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/behn-meter-co-v-sutherland-scotus-1929.