Behlmann v. State
This text of 565 S.W.3d 254 (Behlmann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jeremy Behlmann ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing and finding that Movant failed to demonstrate that his plea counsel was ineffective. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.
*255The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
565 S.W.3d 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/behlmann-v-state-moctapp-2019.