Behlin v. Rite Aid Pharmacy Store

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJuly 24, 2020
Docket1:18-cv-04335
StatusUnknown

This text of Behlin v. Rite Aid Pharmacy Store (Behlin v. Rite Aid Pharmacy Store) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Behlin v. Rite Aid Pharmacy Store, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RAHBU BEHLIN, Plaintiff, 18 Civ. 4335 (KPF) -v.- ORDER RITE AID PHARMACY STORE, et al., Defendants. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s letter docketed July 21, 2020, seeking to compel Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery efforts. (Dkt. #64). Due to the health emergency caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, by Order dated April 1, 2020, the Court granted a motion to stay this case (Dkt. #61), and extended the stay on June 12, 2020 (Dkt. #63). This case is currently stayed, with the stay set to expire on July 27, 2020. (Id.). Because this case and all discovery has been stayed since April 1, 2020, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery. However, the Court reminds the parties that once the stay is lifted, Defendants’ time to respond to any requests for discovery that were pending at the onset of the stay will begin to run again. In response to Plaintiff’s request for assistance litigating his case, the Court invites Plaintiff to make a request for pro bono counsel. Enclosed is information about requesting pro bono counsel and the form Plaintiff must complete to make this request. In determining whether to grant Plaintiff’s application, the Court will consider such factors as whether the litigant’s claim “seems likely to be of substance,” as well as: the indigent’s ability to investigate the crucial facts, whether conflicting evidence implicating the need for cross-examination will be the major proof presented to the fact finder, the indigent’s ability to present the case, the complexity of the legal issues|,] and any special reason in that case why appointment of counsel would be more likely to lead to a just determination. Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 60-61 (2d Cir. 1986). The Court advises Plaintiff that there are no funds to retain counsel in civil cases and the Court relies on volunteers. Even if Plaintiff's request for pro bono counsel is granted, there is no guarantee that a volunteer attorney will decide to take the case, and Plaintiff should be prepared to proceed with the case pro se. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 23, 2020 Kithibee fall. (Zuko New York, New York KATHERINE POLK FAILLA United States District Judge Sent by First Class Mail to: Rahbu Behlin 17-A-1400 Otisville Correctional Facility P.O. Box 8 Otisville, NY 10963

DANIEL PATRICK MOYNIHAN UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 500 PEARL STREET, ROOM 230 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10007 Ruby J. Krajick CLERK OF COURT INFORMATION REGARDING PRO BONO (VOLUNTEER) COUNSEL The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees free legal representation only to persons who have been charged with a crime. The Sixth Amendment guarantee, however, does not extend to persons involved in civil cases. If you are unable to obtain a lawyer to represent you in a civil case pending in federal district court, you may submit an application to the Court to request that a volunteer lawyer represent you for free. Lawyers who volunteer to represent pro se litigants without charging fees are called pro bono lawyers. Pro bono means “for the public good.” The Pro Se Office is responsible for managing the group of lawyers who volunteer to represent pro se litigants in the Southern District of New York for free. This group is known as the Pro Bono Panel.

When to Apply for Pro Bono Counsel A pro se litigant may ask the Court for pro bono counsel at any time. The application for counsel may be submitted with the initial complaint at the beginning of the case, immediately before trial or anytime in between. Applications submitted with the initial complaint, however, may be denied without prejudice to filing a new application once the case proceeds a little further for instance, after the defendants are served with the summons and complaint and have either answered the complaint or moved to dismiss the action. How to Apply for Pro Bono Counsel To apply for pro bono counsel, you must complete an Application for the Court to Request Counsel. If you paid the filing fee for your case or your financial status has changed since you were granted In Forma Pauperis status, you must also submit a new Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If your defendants have already been served with the summons and complaint, you must send them a copy of your Application for the Court to Request Counsel and, if appropriate, the supporting Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before filing your papers with an accompanying Affirmation of Service with the Pro Se Office. If you are a defendant, you must mail a copy of your papers to the plaintiff or his/her lawyer before filing your papers with an accompanying Affirmation of Service with the Pro Se Office. Inmates who have filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and who seek free counsel should complete and file the Application for Appointment of Counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(g) (habeas corpus petition). In such cases, the Criminal Justice Act permits the Court to appoint free counsel for indigent habeas corpus petitioners. Such appointments are made from the Criminal Justice Act Panel of this Court, not the Pro Bono Panel. The Decision to Grant or Deny Counsel The decision to grant or deny counsel is within the judge’s discretion. Factors that the judge may consider when reviewing an application are the complexity of the issues and facts in the case, the type and extent of discovery involved in the case, the complexity of the motions filed in the case, the ability of the litigant to represent himself/herself, the education of the litigant, the ability for the litigant to communicate in English, and the efforts that the litigant has made to obtain a lawyer. If the judge denies your Application without prejudice to renewal, you may file a new application for the Court to Request Counsel at a later date. You should read the judge’s decision carefully as it may provide some guidance as to why the application was denied and what circumstances must change before a new application may be granted. If your Application is granted you should notify the Pro Se Office immediately. What happens when an Application for the Court to Request Counsel is granted? If the Court grants your Application, you should contact the Pro Se Office immediately. The Pro Se Office will then attempt to find a lawyer to volunteer to represent you. The Pro Se Office cannot assign a case to a lawyer or require a lawyer to take a case. Pro bono lawyers take cases on a strictly volunteer basis once an Application is granted. Therefore, even when an Application is granted, there is no guarantee that a lawyer will take your case. The process for finding a pro bono lawyer is often lengthy. Lawyers reviewing your case may choose to contact you to interview you or to discuss your case or they may choose to accept your case without first communicating with you. If a lawyer decides to take your case, you will be notified by mail and the lawyer will file a Notice of Appearance with the Court. The lawyer may ask you to sign a retainer agreement that will set forth the terms and limits of the representation. Unless and until a lawyer volunteers to represent you, or if no lawyer volunteers to represent you, you are responsible for handling your litigation. If you fail to prosecute your case while the Pro Se Office is attempting to locate a lawyer for you, the judge may dismiss your case. You have the right to withdraw your Application for the Court to Request Counsel and to continue to proceed pro se at any time. If you choose to do so, you must make the request to the judge by writing a letter to Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Behlin v. Rite Aid Pharmacy Store, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/behlin-v-rite-aid-pharmacy-store-nysd-2020.