Behlin v. Rite Aid Pharmacy Store

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 24, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-04335·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RAHBU BEHLIN, Plaintiff, 18 Civ. 4335 (KPF) -v.- ORDER RITE AID PHARMACY STORE, et al., Defendants. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s letter docketed July 21, 2020, seeking to compel Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery efforts. (Dkt. #64). Due to the health emergency caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, by Order dated April 1, 2020, the Court granted a motion to stay this case (Dkt. #61), and extended the stay on June 12, 2020 (Dkt. #63). This case is currently stayed, with the stay set to expire on July 27, 2020. (Id.). Because this case and all discovery has been stayed since April 1, 2020, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery. However, the Court reminds the parties that once the stay is lifted, Defendants’ time to respond to any requests for discovery that were pending at the onset of the stay will begin to run again. In response to Plaintiff’s request for assistance litigating his case, the Court invites Plaintiff to make a request for pro bono counsel. Enclosed is information about requesting pro bono counsel and the form Plaintiff must complete to make this request. In determining whether to grant Plaintiff’s application, the Court will consider such factors as whether the litigant’s claim “seems likely to be of substance,” as well as: the indigent’s ability to investigate the crucial facts, whether conflicting evidence implicating the need for cross-examination will be the major proof presented to the fact finder, the indigent’s ability to present the case, the complexity of the legal issues|,] and any special reason in that case why appointment of counsel would be more likely to lead to a just determination. Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 60-61 (2d Cir. 1986). The Court advises Plaintiff that there are no funds to retain counsel in civil cases and the Court relies on volunteers. Even if Plaintiff's request for pro bono counsel is granted, there is no guarantee that a volunteer attorney will decide to take the case, and Plaintiff should be prepared to proceed with the case pro se. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 23, 2020 Kithibee fall. (Zuko New York, New York KATHERINE POLK FAILLA United States District Judge Sent by First Class Mail to: Rahbu Behlin 17-A-1400 Otisville Correctional Facility P.O. Box 8 Otisville, NY 10963

DANIEL PATRICK MOYNIHAN UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 500 PEARL STREET, ROOM 230 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10007 Ruby J. Krajick CLERK OF COURT INFORMATION REGARDING PRO BONO (VOLUNTEER) COUNSEL The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees free legal representation only to persons who have been charged with a crime. The Sixth Amendment guarantee, however, does not extend to persons involved in civil cases. If you are unable to obtain a lawyer to represent you in a civil case pending in federal district court, you may submit an application to the Court to request that a volunteer lawyer represent you for free. Lawyers who volunteer to represent pro se litigants without charging fees are called pro bono lawyers. Pro bono means “for the public good.” The Pro Se Office is responsible for managing the group of lawyers who volunteer to represent pro se litigants in the Southern District of New York for free. This group is known as the Pro Bono Panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Behlin v. Rite Aid Pharmacy Store, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Behlin v. Rite Aid Pharmacy Store (Behlin v. Rite Aid Pharmacy Store) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related