Beharry v. State

1 So. 3d 369, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2225, 2009 WL 211095
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 30, 2009
Docket5D08-4305
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 So. 3d 369 (Beharry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beharry v. State, 1 So. 3d 369, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2225, 2009 WL 211095 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this belated appeal proceeding, the State does not dispute that Petitioner wanted to appeal two Orange County cases involving the same issues and record. Petitioner filed motions to dismiss in Orange County Case Nos. 07-17061 and 07-17124, which were denied. After Petitioner entered pleas reserving the right to appeal the rulings, appellate counsel only filed a timely appeal as to Orange County Case No. 07-17061. We therefore grant the petition to allow the belated appeal in Case *370 No. 07-17124. This opinion will be transmitted to the circuit court and filed there as the notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D). 1

PETITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA, MONACO and COHEN, JJ., concur.
1

. If Petitioner would like to have the two appeals consolidated, a motion to consolidate must be filed in the first appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKELVIN v. State
1 So. 3d 369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 So. 3d 369, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2225, 2009 WL 211095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beharry-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.