Begonia Corp. v. Nam Financial Corp.

710 So. 2d 577, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 887, 1998 WL 39404
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 4, 1998·No. No. 97-0132·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of foreclosure except for the inclusion of the $138,031.45 prepayment penalty, which we reverse and remand. The general rule is that, unless otherwise specifically provided for in the note, the lender cannot upon the lender’s acceleration also collect the prepayment penalty. Florida Nat’l Bank of Miami v. Bankatlantic, 589 So.2d 255, 258 (Fla.1991). The court in Florida National created a limited exception to the general rule applicable under special circumstances including an intentional default by the borrower. Id. at 259. Here, neither the pleadings nor proof establish the applicability of the exception.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Begonia Corp. v. Nam Financial Corp., 710 So. 2d 577, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 887, 1998 WL 39404 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

710 So. 2d 577 (Begonia Corp. v. Nam Financial Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Feinstein v. New Bethel Missionary Baptist
938 So. 2d 562 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Begonia Corp. v. Nam Financial Corp.
724 So. 2d 714 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)