Begley v. Erasime

Supreme Court

Begley v. Erasime

273 U.S. 655, 47 S. Ct. 342

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 17, 1927·No. No. 98·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authority of (1) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power and Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 671; (2) Murray’s Lessee v. Hoboken Land and Improvement Co., 18 Row. 272, [656]*656276; Ownbey v. Morgan, 256 U. S. 94.

Mr. Cleon K. Calvert for plaintiff in error. Alice Eradme, pró se.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authority of (1) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power and Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 671; (2) Murray’s Lessee v. Hoboken Land and Improvement Co., 18 Row. 272, [656]*656276; Ownbey v. Morgan, 256 U. S. 94.

Mr. Cleon K. Calvert for plaintiff in error. Alice Eradme, pró se.

Begley v. Erasime, 273 U.S. 655, 47 S. Ct. 342 (1927).

Pincite

273 U.S. 655 (Begley v. Erasime) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related