Begley v. Erasime

273 U.S. 655, 47 S. Ct. 342
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 17, 1927
DocketNo. 98
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 273 U.S. 655 (Begley v. Erasime) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Begley v. Erasime, 273 U.S. 655, 47 S. Ct. 342 (1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authority of (1) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power and Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 671; (2) Murray’s Lessee v. Hoboken Land and Improvement Co., 18 Row. 272, [656]*656276; Ownbey v. Morgan, 256 U. S. 94.

Mr. Cleon K. Calvert for plaintiff in error. Alice Eradme, pró se.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ravitz v. Steurele, Justice of the Peace
77 S.W.2d 360 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 U.S. 655, 47 S. Ct. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/begley-v-erasime-scotus-1927.