Begin v. Town of Sabattus

531 A.2d 1261, 1987 Me. LEXIS 802
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedOctober 5, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 531 A.2d 1261 (Begin v. Town of Sabattus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Begin v. Town of Sabattus, 531 A.2d 1261, 1987 Me. LEXIS 802 (Me. 1987).

Opinion

WATHEN, Justice.

The petitioner, Gerard Begin, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Androscoggin County) affirming certain action taken by the Sabattus Town Planning Board.

The record reflects that Begin is the owner of an existing mobile home park located in Sabattus. On May 28, 1985, Begin appeared before the Sabattus Town Planning Board and presented a revised map of the park. The revised map redefined the perimeter lines of the park to exclude four lots that could not be used as trailer sites because of the set back requirements of the Sabattus Mobile Home Park Ordinance.

Ultimately, the Board rejected the revised map and Begin sought judicial review. The Superior Court reviewed the Board’s action on the basis that plaintiff had presented a proposal for the development of a new mobile home park under the Sabattus Ordinance. Begin now argues for the first time on appeal, that he did not seek approval for a new mobile home park, “but rather requested permission, in the nature of subdivision approval, to use the parcels for single-family homes.”1

Begin presented no application to the Board and the precise nature of his request remains undetermined on the record before us. No statute or ordinance can be identified as the basis for the authority that the plaintiff sought to invoke on the part of the Board. In such circumstances, the Board’s rejection of the revised map presents no issue suitable for judicial review. See Your Home, Inc. v. City of Portland, 505 A.2d 488 (Me.1986).

The entry is:

Judgment of the Superior Court vacated.

Remanded to the Superior Court with instructions to enter a dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Your Home, Inc. v. City of Portland
505 A.2d 488 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
531 A.2d 1261, 1987 Me. LEXIS 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/begin-v-town-of-sabattus-me-1987.