Beggs v. Beggs
This text of 2014 Ark. App. 706 (Beggs v. Beggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 706
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-14-419
Opinion Delivered DECEMBER 10, 2014
RONALD BEGGS APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIFTEENTH DIVISION V. [NO. 60DR-06-39]
HONORABLE RICHARD MOORE, ELIZABETH M. BEGGS JUDGE APPELLEE REMANDED TO SETTLE AND SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD
KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge
Appellant Ronald Beggs appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify
alimony. On appeal, Mr. Beggs asserts that there was a reduction in his income and that the
trial court erred in refusing to reduce his alimony obligation to his ex-wife, appellee Elizabeth
Beggs. We remand for the record to be settled and supplemented, and we order
supplementation of the addendum.
Bringing forward a sufficient record to allow determination of the issues on appeal is
the responsibility of the appellant. Barnett v. Monumental Gen. Ins. Co., 354 Ark. 692, 128
S.W.3d 803 (2003). Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Civil 6(e) (2014) provides that,
if anything material to either party is omitted from the record, the appellate court may, on its Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 706
own initiative, direct that the omission be corrected and that a supplemental record be
certified and transmitted.
Here, the record is incomplete because it does not include a copy of the divorce
decree, which contains the alimony award Mr. Beggs is seeking to modify. See Jewell v. Duree-
Jewell, 2011 Ark. App. 490. This document is essential to our understanding of the case. Id.
Because that order is not contained in the record brought forward by Mr. Beggs, we remand
this case to settle and supplement the record. Mr. Beggs has thirty days from the date of this
opinion to file a supplemental record that includes the divorce decree.
Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8) (2014) requires that the addendum to the
appellant’s brief contain copies of non-transcript documents in the record on appeal that are
essential for the appellate court to confirm its jurisdiction, understand the case, and decide the
issues on appeal. In addition to the divorce decree being essential to our understanding of the
case, the addendum must also contain an accurate copy of the appellant’s motion to modify
alimony and his notice of appeal.1 We direct Mr. Beggs to file a supplemental addendum
pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(b)(4) (2014), which includes a copy of the
divorce decree and complete copies of the motion to modify alimony and the notice of
appeal. The supplemental addendum shall be filed within seven days after the supplemental
record has been filed with this court.
1 The addendum submitted by Mr. Beggs inadvertently omitted the second page of both his motion to modify alimony and his notice of appeal.
2 Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 706
Remanded to settle and supplement the record; supplementation of the addendum
ordered.
HARRISON and WOOD, JJ., agree.
Holleman & Associates, P.A., by: Maryna O. Jackson; and Dodds, Kidd & Ryan, by: David
W. Kamps, for appellant.
Dover Dixon Horne PLLC, by: Gary B. Rogers, for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ark. App. 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beggs-v-beggs-arkctapp-2014.