Beggs v. Beggs

2014 Ark. App. 706
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedDecember 10, 2014
DocketCV-14-419
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2014 Ark. App. 706 (Beggs v. Beggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beggs v. Beggs, 2014 Ark. App. 706 (Ark. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 706

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-14-419

Opinion Delivered DECEMBER 10, 2014

RONALD BEGGS APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIFTEENTH DIVISION V. [NO. 60DR-06-39]

HONORABLE RICHARD MOORE, ELIZABETH M. BEGGS JUDGE APPELLEE REMANDED TO SETTLE AND SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD

KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge

Appellant Ronald Beggs appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify

alimony. On appeal, Mr. Beggs asserts that there was a reduction in his income and that the

trial court erred in refusing to reduce his alimony obligation to his ex-wife, appellee Elizabeth

Beggs. We remand for the record to be settled and supplemented, and we order

supplementation of the addendum.

Bringing forward a sufficient record to allow determination of the issues on appeal is

the responsibility of the appellant. Barnett v. Monumental Gen. Ins. Co., 354 Ark. 692, 128

S.W.3d 803 (2003). Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Civil 6(e) (2014) provides that,

if anything material to either party is omitted from the record, the appellate court may, on its Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 706

own initiative, direct that the omission be corrected and that a supplemental record be

certified and transmitted.

Here, the record is incomplete because it does not include a copy of the divorce

decree, which contains the alimony award Mr. Beggs is seeking to modify. See Jewell v. Duree-

Jewell, 2011 Ark. App. 490. This document is essential to our understanding of the case. Id.

Because that order is not contained in the record brought forward by Mr. Beggs, we remand

this case to settle and supplement the record. Mr. Beggs has thirty days from the date of this

opinion to file a supplemental record that includes the divorce decree.

Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8) (2014) requires that the addendum to the

appellant’s brief contain copies of non-transcript documents in the record on appeal that are

essential for the appellate court to confirm its jurisdiction, understand the case, and decide the

issues on appeal. In addition to the divorce decree being essential to our understanding of the

case, the addendum must also contain an accurate copy of the appellant’s motion to modify

alimony and his notice of appeal.1 We direct Mr. Beggs to file a supplemental addendum

pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(b)(4) (2014), which includes a copy of the

divorce decree and complete copies of the motion to modify alimony and the notice of

appeal. The supplemental addendum shall be filed within seven days after the supplemental

record has been filed with this court.

1 The addendum submitted by Mr. Beggs inadvertently omitted the second page of both his motion to modify alimony and his notice of appeal.

2 Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 706

Remanded to settle and supplement the record; supplementation of the addendum

ordered.

HARRISON and WOOD, JJ., agree.

Holleman & Associates, P.A., by: Maryna O. Jackson; and Dodds, Kidd & Ryan, by: David

W. Kamps, for appellant.

Dover Dixon Horne PLLC, by: Gary B. Rogers, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bugg v. Director, Department of Workforce Services, and City of Hot Springs
2020 Ark. App. 206 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2020)
Beggs v. Beggs
2015 Ark. App. 86 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ark. App. 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beggs-v-beggs-arkctapp-2014.