Beggs & Son v. Wellman
82 Ala. 391
Opinion
— When a plaintiff sues by the wrong Christian name, or by the initials, the -complaint may be amended by introducing the true or full name.. In such case, there is not an entire change of parties, nor is the name of a sole plaintiff stricken out, so that no actor is. left. . The same plaintiff remains, and the insertion of the full Christian name is a mere correction of its .description, which is allowable under our liberal statute of amendments. S. & N. Ala. R. R. Co. v. Small, 70 Ala. 499; Smith v. Plank Road Co., 30 Ala. 650.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beggs & Son v. Wellman, 82 Ala. 391 (Ala. 1886).
82 Ala. 391 (Beggs & Son v. Wellman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. Griffin
142 So. 543 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Fencing District No. 6 of Woodruff County v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
21 S.W.2d 959 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1929)
Springer v. Sullivan
119 So. 851 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)
Ewton v. McCracken
64 So. 177 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)