Beggs & Son v. Arnotte
This text of 80 Ala. 179 (Beggs & Son v. Arnotte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint was in the form prescribed by the Code for a suit “on a promissory note by'payee against maker,” and contained a cause of action sufficiently substantial to support a judgment by default against the maker. The precise point lias been several times settled by this court. — Letondal v. Huguenin, 26 Ala. 552; Cummings v. Richards, 32 Ala. 459; Code, 1876, Form No. 4, p. 701.
The case of Douglas v. Beasley, 40 Ala. 142, relied on by appellants’ counsel, does not conflict with this view. The action there was one by the assignee of a promissory note, and the complaint failed to aver the fact of assignment, or to contain any other averment showing the plaintiff’s ownership of the note.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 Ala. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beggs-son-v-arnotte-ala-1885.