Beggio v. State

870 So. 2d 964, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5841, 2004 WL 893939
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 2004·No. No. 1D04-1247·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Peter Beggio seeks a belated appeal of a June 2001 order of the circuit court denying his motion for postconviction relief. We deny the petition, concluding that it is untimely under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(4)(A). Moreover, even if the present petition is deemed to relate back to the prior pro se petition that was timely filed but was dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court, we find that the matters alleged in the petition fail to set forth a basis for the granting of a belated appeal. While petitioner’s prior counsel may have given him a candid assessment of the likelihood of a successful appeal of the denial of his postconviction motion, petitioner has failed to show that his counsel improperly discouraged him from filing an appeal.

PETITION FOR BELATED APPEAL DENIED.

KAHN, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beggio v. State, 870 So. 2d 964, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5841, 2004 WL 893939 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

870 So. 2d 964 (Beggio v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zito v. Jeff Harding, Inc.
870 So. 2d 964 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)