Begam v. Damast

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Begam v. Damast

265 A.D.2d 283, 696 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9646

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 4, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 283 (Begam v. Damast) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Begam v. Damast, 265 A.D.2d 283, 696 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9646 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.), dated August 27, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as barred by Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (6).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly awarded the defendant summary judgment as the action is barred by the exclusivity of the Workers’ Compensation remedy {see, Workers’ Cbmpensation Law § 29 [6]). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.), dated August 27, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as barred by Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (6).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly awarded the defendant summary judgment as the action is barred by the exclusivity of the Workers’ Compensation remedy {see, Workers’ Cbmpensation Law § 29 [6]). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 283, 696 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/begam-v-damast-nyappdiv-1999.