Beets v. Collins

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 5, 1993
Docket91-4606
StatusPublished

This text of Beets v. Collins (Beets v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beets v. Collins, (5th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 91-4606

BETTY LOU BEETS, Petitioner-Appellee Cross-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Repsondent-Appellant Cross Appellee.

- - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas - - - - -

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion March 18, 1993, 5 Cir., 1993, _____F.2d,____)

(August 5, 1993)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, E. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested

a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of

the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a

rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the

Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of

supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Newell
315 F.3d 510 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Beets v. Collins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beets-v-collins-ca5-1993.