Beets v. Collins
This text of Beets v. Collins (Beets v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 91-4606
BETTY LOU BEETS, Petitioner-Appellee Cross-Appellant,
versus
JAMES A. COLLINS, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Repsondent-Appellant Cross Appellee.
- - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas - - - - -
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion March 18, 1993, 5 Cir., 1993, _____F.2d,____)
(August 5, 1993)
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, E. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested
a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of
the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a
rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the
Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of
supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Beets v. Collins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beets-v-collins-ca5-1993.