Beethoven Building Ass'n v. Weber
5 A. 235, 2 Sadler 294, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 760
Opinion
The affidavit of defense does not aver facts with sufficient precision to show they would constitute a valid defense. Whether the $100 was paid as a bonus or to apply on the order is left to conjecture. The claim filed indicates the latter. If any improper act was done by the treasurer, who was the officer of the association, the latter should not be permitted to plead that action as a bar to a recovery.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beethoven Building Ass'n v. Weber, 5 A. 235, 2 Sadler 294, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 760 (Pa. 1886).
5 A. 235 (Beethoven Building Ass'n v. Weber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lavendan v. Forstall
4 Teiss. 355 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1907)
Bérard v. Boagni
30 La. 1125 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1878)
Porter v. Brown
21 La. Ann. 532 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1869)
Kugler v. Taylor
70 La. Ann. 100 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1867)