Beethoven Building Ass'n v. Weber

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Beethoven Building Ass'n v. Weber

5 A. 235, 2 Sadler 294, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 760

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 19, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 5 A. 235 (Beethoven Building Ass'n v. Weber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beethoven Building Ass'n v. Weber, 5 A. 235, 2 Sadler 294, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 760 (Pa. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The affidavit of defense does not aver facts with sufficient precision to show they would constitute a valid defense. Whether the $100 was paid as a bonus or to apply on the order is left to conjecture. The claim filed indicates the latter. If any improper act was done by the treasurer, who was the officer of the association, the latter should not be permitted to plead that action as a bar to a recovery.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The affidavit of defense does not aver facts with sufficient precision to show they would constitute a valid defense. Whether the $100 was paid as a bonus or to apply on the order is left to conjecture. The claim filed indicates the latter. If any improper act was done by the treasurer, who was the officer of the association, the latter should not be permitted to plead that action as a bar to a recovery.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A. 235, 2 Sadler 294, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beethoven-building-assn-v-weber-pa-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack