Beeter v. State

2018 ND 129, 911 N.W.2d 886
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided June 5, 2018·No. 20180032·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Robert Beeter appeals from a district court judgment summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Beeter argues that the district court erred by concluding his application was barred by the statute of limitations. He contends the 2017 amendment to N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23(1)(a)(2) is a new interpretation of law and the district court should have retroactively applied it to his case. See N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-01(3)(a)(3). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7), concluding Beeter's application was time-barred. See State v. Iverson , 2006 ND 193 , ¶¶ 6-8, 721 N.W.2d 396 (denying retroactive application of statute that became effective after final conviction).

*887 [¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beeter v. State, 2018 ND 129, 911 N.W.2d 886 (N.D. 2018).

2018 ND 129 (Beeter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garcia v. State
2019 ND 103 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)