Beeter v. State

2018 ND 129, 911 N.W.2d 886
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJune 5, 2018
Docket20180032
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2018 ND 129 (Beeter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beeter v. State, 2018 ND 129, 911 N.W.2d 886 (N.D. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Robert Beeter appeals from a district court judgment summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Beeter argues that the district court erred by concluding his application was barred by the statute of limitations. He contends the 2017 amendment to N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23(1)(a)(2) is a new interpretation of law and the district court should have retroactively applied it to his case. See N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-01(3)(a)(3). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7), concluding Beeter's application was time-barred. See State v. Iverson , 2006 ND 193 , ¶¶ 6-8, 721 N.W.2d 396 (denying retroactive application of statute that became effective after final conviction).

*887 [¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garcia v. State
2019 ND 103 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 ND 129, 911 N.W.2d 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beeter-v-state-nd-2018.