Beeter v. State
This text of 2016 ND 119 (Beeter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 6/30/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2016 ND 119
Robert Duane Beeter, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20160041
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Laura C. Ringsak, 103 South Third St., Ste. 6, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Marie A. Miller, Ward County Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58702-5005, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Beeter v. State
[¶1] Robert Beeter appeals a district court order denying his application for post-
conviction relief. Beeter argues the district court erred in denying his application because his trial counsel’s representation was ineffective. Specifically, he alleges his trial counsel did not provide him with discovery, did not pursue pretrial investigation, and did not adequately advise him so that he could make an informed and intelligent decision before entering a plea. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) .
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 ND 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beeter-v-state-nd-2016.