Beeson's Ex'r. v. Beeson's Adm'r

2 Del. 37
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided July 5, 1835·Published

Opinion

The Chief Justice

said, the case in Term Reports has been overrul *38 ed again and again. The undoubted principle of the common law is; that you cannot, go beyond the penalty, except a shilling by way of nominal damages; But our act of assembly is conclusive (Digest 78.) All the sections of this law proceed on the same principle, that judgment shall be for the penalty and Costs-.

Hamilton and Booth for plaintiff J. A Bayard for defendant-.

Buie absolute;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beeson's Ex'r. v. Beeson's Adm'r, 2 Del. 37 (Del. Ct. App. 1835).

2 Del. 37 (Beeson's Ex'r. v. Beeson's Adm'r) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arnold and Others v. The United States
13 U.S. 104 (Supreme Court, 1815)
Perit v. Wallis
2 U.S. 252 (Supreme Court, 1796)