Beeson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Beeson v. State

711 So. 2d 1345, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6559, 1998 WL 307374

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 10, 1998

DocketNo. 97-04486

StatusPublished

This text of 711 So. 2d 1345 (Beeson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beeson v. State, 711 So. 2d 1345, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6559, 1998 WL 307374 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

THREADGILL, Acting Chief Judge.

Curtis Duane Beeson appeals an order denying his motion for return of property after he was acquitted of the charge of carrying a concealed firearm. At a hearing on the motion, the State advanced only one justification for denial: the prosecutor’s opinion that Bee-son was not the type of person who should own a gun. This was an insufficient basis upon which to deny the motion. On appeal, the State concedes that the motion for return of property should have been granted. Accordingly, we reverse.

Reversed.

PATTERSON and GREEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THREADGILL, Acting Chief Judge.

Curtis Duane Beeson appeals an order denying his motion for return of property after he was acquitted of the charge of carrying a concealed firearm. At a hearing on the motion, the State advanced only one justification for denial: the prosecutor’s opinion that Bee-son was not the type of person who should own a gun. This was an insufficient basis upon which to deny the motion. On appeal, the State concedes that the motion for return of property should have been granted. Accordingly, we reverse.

Reversed.

PATTERSON and GREEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

711 So. 2d 1345, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6559, 1998 WL 307374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beeson-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.