Beeson v. Brownfield
This text of 1 Pennyp. 468 (Beeson v. Brownfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is well settled by Ludwick v. Huntzinger, 5 W. & S., 51, and many other cases, that when articles for the sale of land have been executed by a deed, in an action on the securities given for the purchase-money, it is not sufficient for the grantee to give in evidence a defective title; he must prove a superior indisputable title in a third person who is asserting his right thereto by virtue of such title. Nothing of the kind was shown here. Victor’s evidence failed to show a good title by adverse possession for twenty-one years. Cutting timber, and coaling the land, did not constitute such a possession, and the little house on it, whatever it was, had been there only eight or ten years.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Pennyp. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beeson-v-brownfield-pa-1881.